2000 Audi TT vs. 1983 Nissan Pulsar
To start off, 2000 Audi TT is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Nissan Pulsar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Nissan Pulsar would be higher. At 1,781 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Audi TT is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Audi TT (180 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 121 more horse power than 1983 Nissan Pulsar. (59 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Audi TT should accelerate faster than 1983 Nissan Pulsar.
Because 2000 Audi TT is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1983 Nissan Pulsar. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Audi TT will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Audi TT (245 Nm) has 149 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Nissan Pulsar. (96 Nm). This means 2000 Audi TT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Nissan Pulsar.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Audi TT | 1983 Nissan Pulsar | |
Make | Audi | Nissan |
Model | TT | Pulsar |
Year Released | 2000 | 1983 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1781 cc | 1270 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 180 HP | 59 HP |
Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 245 Nm | 96 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 3970 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2420 mm |