2000 Audi TT vs. 1986 Citroen CX
To start off, 2000 Audi TT is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Citroen CX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Citroen CX would be higher. At 2,165 cc (4 cylinders), 1986 Citroen CX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Audi TT (180 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 66 more horse power than 1986 Citroen CX. (114 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Audi TT should accelerate faster than 1986 Citroen CX.
Because 2000 Audi TT is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1986 Citroen CX. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Audi TT will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Audi TT (245 Nm) has 67 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Citroen CX. (178 Nm). This means 2000 Audi TT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Citroen CX.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Audi TT | 1986 Citroen CX | |
| Make | Audi | Citroen |
| Model | TT | CX |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1986 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1781 cc | 2165 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 180 HP | 114 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Torque | 245 Nm | 178 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 81 mm | 90 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 86.4 mm | 85.5 mm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 4930 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1770 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1470 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 3100 mm |
