2000 Audi TT vs. 1986 Ford Taurus
To start off, 2000 Audi TT is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Ford Taurus. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Ford Taurus would be higher. At 2,513 cc (4 cylinders), 1986 Ford Taurus is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Audi TT (180 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 91 more horse power than 1986 Ford Taurus. (89 HP @ 4400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Audi TT should accelerate faster than 1986 Ford Taurus.
Because 2000 Audi TT is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1986 Ford Taurus. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Audi TT will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Audi TT (245 Nm) has 69 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Ford Taurus. (176 Nm). This means 2000 Audi TT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Ford Taurus.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Audi TT | 1986 Ford Taurus | |
Make | Audi | Ford |
Model | TT | Taurus |
Year Released | 2000 | 1986 |
Body Type | Coupe | Station Wagon |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1781 cc | 2513 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 180 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Torque | 245 Nm | 176 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 4910 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1800 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2700 mm |