2000 Audi TT vs. 1991 Nissan Presea
To start off, 2000 Audi TT is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1991 Nissan Presea. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1991 Nissan Presea would be higher. At 1,781 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Audi TT is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Audi TT (180 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 86 more horse power than 1991 Nissan Presea. (94 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Audi TT should accelerate faster than 1991 Nissan Presea.
Because 2000 Audi TT is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1991 Nissan Presea. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Audi TT will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Audi TT (245 Nm) has 120 more torque (in Nm) than 1991 Nissan Presea. (125 Nm). This means 2000 Audi TT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1991 Nissan Presea.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Audi TT | 1991 Nissan Presea | |
Make | Audi | Nissan |
Model | TT | Presea |
Year Released | 2000 | 1991 |
Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1781 cc | 1497 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 180 HP | 94 HP |
Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 245 Nm | 125 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 4400 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1330 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2510 mm |