2000 Audi TT vs. 1992 Jeep Cherokee
To start off, 2000 Audi TT is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Jeep Cherokee. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Jeep Cherokee would be higher. At 3,960 cc (6 cylinders), 1992 Jeep Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Jeep Cherokee (181 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 1 more horse power than 2000 Audi TT. (180 HP @ 6300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1992 Jeep Cherokee should accelerate faster than 2000 Audi TT.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1992 Jeep Cherokee (301 Nm) has 56 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Audi TT. (245 Nm). This means 1992 Jeep Cherokee will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Audi TT.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Audi TT | 1992 Jeep Cherokee | |
Make | Audi | Jeep |
Model | TT | Cherokee |
Year Released | 2000 | 1992 |
Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1781 cc | 3960 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 180 HP | 181 HP |
Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Torque | 245 Nm | 301 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 4300 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1800 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1630 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2580 mm |