2000 Audi TT vs. 1993 Mazda 626
To start off, 2000 Audi TT is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1993 Mazda 626. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1993 Mazda 626 would be higher. At 1,991 cc (4 cylinders), 1993 Mazda 626 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Audi TT (170 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 60 more horse power than 1993 Mazda 626. (110 HP @ 5300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Audi TT should accelerate faster than 1993 Mazda 626. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Audi TT weights approximately 60 kg more than 1993 Mazda 626. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2000 Audi TT (235 Nm @ 1950 RPM) has 67 more torque (in Nm) than 1993 Mazda 626. (168 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2000 Audi TT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1993 Mazda 626.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Audi TT | 1993 Mazda 626 | |
Make | Audi | Mazda |
Model | TT | 626 |
Year Released | 2000 | 1993 |
Body Type | Coupe | Station Wagon |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1781 cc | 1991 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 170 HP | 110 HP |
Engine RPM | 5700 RPM | 5300 RPM |
Torque | 235 Nm | 168 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1950 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 81 mm | 80 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 86.4 mm | 98 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1280 kg | 1220 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 4600 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2620 mm |