2000 Audi TT vs. 1994 Mazda 323
To start off, 2000 Audi TT is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Mazda 323. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Mazda 323 would be higher. At 1,995 cc (6 cylinders), 1994 Mazda 323 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Audi TT (180 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 35 more horse power than 1994 Mazda 323. (145 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Audi TT should accelerate faster than 1994 Mazda 323.
Because 2000 Audi TT is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1994 Mazda 323. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Audi TT will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Audi TT (245 Nm) has 62 more torque (in Nm) than 1994 Mazda 323. (183 Nm). This means 2000 Audi TT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1994 Mazda 323.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Audi TT | 1994 Mazda 323 | |
Make | Audi | Mazda |
Model | TT | 323 |
Year Released | 2000 | 1994 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1781 cc | 1995 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 180 HP | 145 HP |
Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 245 Nm | 183 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 81 mm | 78 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 86.4 mm | 69.6 mm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 4250 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2610 mm |