2000 Audi TT vs. 1995 BMW Dinan
To start off, 2000 Audi TT is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 BMW Dinan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 BMW Dinan would be higher. At 5,598 cc (12 cylinders), 1995 BMW Dinan is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1995 BMW Dinan is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1995 BMW Dinan. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Audi TT, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1995 BMW Dinan (976 Nm) has 741 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Audi TT. (235 Nm). This means 1995 BMW Dinan will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Audi TT.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Audi TT | 1995 BMW Dinan | |
Make | Audi | BMW |
Model | TT | Dinan |
Year Released | 2000 | 1995 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1781 cc | 5598 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 170 HP | 0 HP |
Engine RPM | 5700 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 235 Nm | 976 Nm |
Top Speed | 209 km/hour | 321 km/hour |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 4790 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1860 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2770 mm |