2000 Audi TT vs. 1995 Chrysler Neon
To start off, 2000 Audi TT is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Chrysler Neon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Chrysler Neon would be higher. At 1,996 cc (4 cylinders), 1995 Chrysler Neon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Audi TT (180 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 49 more horse power than 1995 Chrysler Neon. (131 HP @ 5850 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Audi TT should accelerate faster than 1995 Chrysler Neon.
Because 2000 Audi TT is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1995 Chrysler Neon. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Audi TT will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Audi TT (245 Nm) has 71 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Chrysler Neon. (174 Nm). This means 2000 Audi TT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Chrysler Neon.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Audi TT | 1995 Chrysler Neon | |
Make | Audi | Chrysler |
Model | TT | Neon |
Year Released | 2000 | 1995 |
Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1781 cc | 1996 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 180 HP | 131 HP |
Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 5850 RPM |
Torque | 245 Nm | 174 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 4370 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2650 mm |