2000 Audi TT vs. 1995 Ford Aerostar
To start off, 2000 Audi TT is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Ford Aerostar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Ford Aerostar would be higher. At 2,979 cc (6 cylinders), 1995 Ford Aerostar is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Audi TT (180 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 46 more horse power than 1995 Ford Aerostar. (134 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Audi TT should accelerate faster than 1995 Ford Aerostar.
Because 2000 Audi TT is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1995 Ford Aerostar. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Audi TT will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Audi TT (245 Nm) has 28 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Ford Aerostar. (217 Nm). This means 2000 Audi TT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Ford Aerostar.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Audi TT | 1995 Ford Aerostar | |
Make | Audi | Ford |
Model | TT | Aerostar |
Year Released | 2000 | 1995 |
Body Type | Coupe | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1781 cc | 2979 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 180 HP | 134 HP |
Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Torque | 245 Nm | 217 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 4450 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1860 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 3030 mm |