2000 Audi TT vs. 1996 Chevrolet Tracker

To start off, 2000 Audi TT is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Chevrolet Tracker. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Chevrolet Tracker would be higher. At 1,781 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Audi TT is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Audi TT (180 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 84 more horse power than 1996 Chevrolet Tracker. (96 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Audi TT should accelerate faster than 1996 Chevrolet Tracker. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Audi TT weights approximately 80 kg more than 1996 Chevrolet Tracker. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Audi TT (226 Nm) has 87 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Chevrolet Tracker. (139 Nm). This means 2000 Audi TT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Chevrolet Tracker.

Compare all specifications:

2000 Audi TT 1996 Chevrolet Tracker
Make Audi Chevrolet
Model TT Tracker
Year Released 2000 1996
Body Type Convertible SUV
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1781 cc 1589 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 180 HP 96 HP
Engine RPM 6500 RPM 5200 RPM
Torque 226 Nm 139 Nm
Drive Type 4WD 4WD
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Vehicle Weight 1310 kg 1230 kg
Vehicle Length 4050 mm 3860 mm
Vehicle Width 1770 mm 1720 mm
Vehicle Height 1360 mm 1700 mm
Wheelbase Size 2430 mm 2210 mm