2000 Audi TT vs. 1996 Mazda 626
To start off, 2000 Audi TT is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Mazda 626. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Mazda 626 would be higher. At 1,996 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Mazda 626 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Audi TT (180 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 91 more horse power than 1996 Mazda 626. (89 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Audi TT should accelerate faster than 1996 Mazda 626.
Let's talk about torque, 2000 Audi TT (245 Nm) has 95 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Mazda 626. (150 Nm). This means 2000 Audi TT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Mazda 626.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Audi TT | 1996 Mazda 626 | |
| Make | Audi | Mazda |
| Model | TT | 626 |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1996 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Station Wagon |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1781 cc | 1996 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 180 HP | 89 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Torque | 245 Nm | 150 Nm |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 4600 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1440 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2620 mm |
