2000 Audi TT vs. 1996 Mazda Midge
To start off, 2000 Audi TT is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Mazda Midge. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Mazda Midge would be higher. At 1,781 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Audi TT is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Audi TT (180 HP) has 113 more horse power than 1996 Mazda Midge. (67 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Audi TT should accelerate faster than 1996 Mazda Midge.
Because 2000 Audi TT is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1996 Mazda Midge. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Audi TT will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Audi TT (245 Nm) has 144 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Mazda Midge. (101 Nm). This means 2000 Audi TT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Mazda Midge.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Audi TT | 1996 Mazda Midge | |
| Make | Audi | Mazda |
| Model | TT | Midge |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1996 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1781 cc | 1323 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 180 HP | 67 HP |
| Torque | 245 Nm | 101 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 4000 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1650 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1400 mm |
