2000 Audi TT vs. 1996 Pontiac Trans Sport
To start off, 2000 Audi TT is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Pontiac Trans Sport. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Pontiac Trans Sport would be higher. At 2,260 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Pontiac Trans Sport is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Audi TT (180 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 35 more horse power than 1996 Pontiac Trans Sport. (145 HP @ 5800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Audi TT should accelerate faster than 1996 Pontiac Trans Sport.
Because 2000 Audi TT is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1996 Pontiac Trans Sport. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Audi TT will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Audi TT (245 Nm) has 55 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Pontiac Trans Sport. (190 Nm). This means 2000 Audi TT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Pontiac Trans Sport.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Audi TT | 1996 Pontiac Trans Sport | |
Make | Audi | Pontiac |
Model | TT | Trans Sport |
Year Released | 2000 | 1996 |
Body Type | Coupe | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1781 cc | 2260 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 180 HP | 145 HP |
Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Torque | 245 Nm | 190 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 81 mm | 92 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 86.4 mm | 85 mm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 4760 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1890 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1720 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2820 mm |