2000 Audi TT vs. 1997 Caterham C21
To start off, 2000 Audi TT is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Caterham C21. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Caterham C21 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 1997 Caterham C21 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Caterham C21 (250 HP @ 8000 RPM) has 70 more horse power than 2000 Audi TT. (180 HP @ 6500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1997 Caterham C21 should accelerate faster than 2000 Audi TT. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Audi TT weights approximately 620 kg more than 1997 Caterham C21.
Because 2000 Audi TT is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1997 Caterham C21. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Audi TT will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1997 Caterham C21 (252 Nm) has 26 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Audi TT. (226 Nm). This means 1997 Caterham C21 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Audi TT.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Audi TT | 1997 Caterham C21 | |
Make | Audi | Caterham |
Model | TT | C21 |
Year Released | 2000 | 1997 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1781 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 180 HP | 250 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 8000 RPM |
Torque | 226 Nm | 252 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1310 kg | 690 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 3810 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1590 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1060 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2260 mm |