2000 Audi TT vs. 1997 Chrysler Phaeton
To start off, 2000 Audi TT is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Chrysler Phaeton. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Chrysler Phaeton would be higher. At 5,400 cc (12 cylinders), 1997 Chrysler Phaeton is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Chrysler Phaeton (475 HP) has 305 more horse power than 2000 Audi TT. (170 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1997 Chrysler Phaeton should accelerate faster than 2000 Audi TT.
Because 1997 Chrysler Phaeton is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1997 Chrysler Phaeton. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Audi TT, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1997 Chrysler Phaeton has automatic transmission and 2000 Audi TT has manual transmission. 2000 Audi TT will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1997 Chrysler Phaeton will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Audi TT | 1997 Chrysler Phaeton | |
| Make | Audi | Chrysler |
| Model | TT | Phaeton |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1997 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Convertible |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1781 cc | 5400 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 170 HP | 475 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 5470 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1990 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1400 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 3360 mm |
