2000 Audi TT vs. 1999 BMW Z9
To start off, 2000 Audi TT is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 BMW Z9. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 BMW Z9 would be higher. At 3,901 cc (8 cylinders), 1999 BMW Z9 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 BMW Z9 (242 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 25 more horse power than 2000 Audi TT. (217 HP @ 5700 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1999 BMW Z9 should accelerate faster than 2000 Audi TT.
Because 1999 BMW Z9 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1999 BMW Z9. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Audi TT, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 BMW Z9 (560 Nm @ 1750 RPM) has 274 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Audi TT. (286 Nm @ 2200 RPM). This means 1999 BMW Z9 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Audi TT.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Audi TT | 1999 BMW Z9 | |
Make | Audi | BMW |
Model | TT | Z9 |
Year Released | 2000 | 1999 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1781 cc | 3901 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 217 HP | 242 HP |
Engine RPM | 5700 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 286 Nm | 560 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2200 RPM | 1750 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 5010 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 2010 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 3110 mm |