2000 Audi TT vs. 1999 Mazda B2500
To start off, 2000 Audi TT is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Mazda B2500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Mazda B2500 would be higher. At 2,499 cc (4 cylinders), 1999 Mazda B2500 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Audi TT (180 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 98 more horse power than 1999 Mazda B2500. (82 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Audi TT should accelerate faster than 1999 Mazda B2500.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Audi TT (245 Nm) has 51 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Mazda B2500. (194 Nm). This means 2000 Audi TT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Mazda B2500.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Audi TT | 1999 Mazda B2500 | |
| Make | Audi | Mazda |
| Model | TT | B2500 |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1999 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Pickup |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1781 cc | 2499 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 3 valves |
| Horse Power | 180 HP | 82 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 245 Nm | 194 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 3 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 5010 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1620 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2990 mm |
