2000 Audi TT vs. 2001 Chevrolet Tracker
To start off, 2001 Chevrolet Tracker is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Audi TT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Audi TT would be higher. At 2,499 cc (6 cylinders), 2001 Chevrolet Tracker is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Chevrolet Tracker weights approximately 230 kg more than 2000 Audi TT.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Audi TT (226 Nm) has 9 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Chevrolet Tracker. (217 Nm). This means 2000 Audi TT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Chevrolet Tracker.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Audi TT | 2001 Chevrolet Tracker | |
Make | Audi | Chevrolet |
Model | TT | Tracker |
Year Released | 2000 | 2001 |
Body Type | Convertible | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1781 cc | 2499 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 180 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 226 Nm | 217 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1310 kg | 1540 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 3860 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1700 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2210 mm |