2000 Audi TT vs. 2001 GMC Sierra
To start off, 2001 GMC Sierra is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Audi TT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Audi TT would be higher. At 4,293 cc (6 cylinders), 2001 GMC Sierra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Audi TT (217 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 20 more horse power than 2001 GMC Sierra. (197 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Audi TT should accelerate faster than 2001 GMC Sierra. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 GMC Sierra weights approximately 300 kg more than 2000 Audi TT.
Because 2001 GMC Sierra is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Audi TT. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 GMC Sierra will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 GMC Sierra (352 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 66 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Audi TT. (286 Nm @ 2200 RPM). This means 2001 GMC Sierra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Audi TT.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Audi TT | 2001 GMC Sierra | |
Make | Audi | GMC |
Model | TT | Sierra |
Year Released | 2000 | 2001 |
Body Type | Convertible | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1781 cc | 4293 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 217 HP | 197 HP |
Engine RPM | 5700 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Torque | 286 Nm | 352 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2200 RPM | 2800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1475 kg | 1775 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 5170 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 2000 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1810 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 3030 mm |