2000 Audi TT vs. 2003 Chrysler Airflite
To start off, 2003 Chrysler Airflite is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Audi TT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Audi TT would be higher. At 3,518 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Chrysler Airflite is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Chrysler Airflite (253 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 73 more horse power than 2000 Audi TT. (180 HP @ 6300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Chrysler Airflite should accelerate faster than 2000 Audi TT.
Let's talk about torque, 2003 Chrysler Airflite (341 Nm) has 96 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Audi TT. (245 Nm). This means 2003 Chrysler Airflite will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Audi TT.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Audi TT | 2003 Chrysler Airflite | |
| Make | Audi | Chrysler |
| Model | TT | Airflite |
| Year Released | 2000 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1781 cc | 3518 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 180 HP | 253 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 6400 RPM |
| Torque | 245 Nm | 341 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 81 mm | 96 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 86.4 mm | 81 mm |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 4840 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1880 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2950 mm |
