2000 Audi TT vs. 2003 Rover 75
To start off, 2003 Rover 75 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Audi TT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Audi TT would be higher. At 1,795 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Rover 75 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Audi TT (180 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 62 more horse power than 2003 Rover 75. (118 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Audi TT should accelerate faster than 2003 Rover 75.
Because 2000 Audi TT is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2003 Rover 75. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Audi TT will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Audi TT (245 Nm) has 85 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Rover 75. (160 Nm). This means 2000 Audi TT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Rover 75.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Audi TT | 2003 Rover 75 | |
Make | Audi | Rover |
Model | TT | 75 |
Year Released | 2000 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1781 cc | 1795 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 180 HP | 118 HP |
Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 245 Nm | 160 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 4760 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2750 mm |