2000 Audi TT vs. 2003 Xedos 9
To start off, 2003 Xedos 9 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Audi TT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Audi TT would be higher. At 2,495 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Xedos 9 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Audi TT (217 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 56 more horse power than 2003 Xedos 9. (161 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Audi TT should accelerate faster than 2003 Xedos 9. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Xedos 9 weights approximately 110 kg more than 2000 Audi TT.
Let's talk about torque, 2000 Audi TT (286 Nm @ 2200 RPM) has 74 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Xedos 9. (212 Nm @ 4900 RPM). This means 2000 Audi TT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Xedos 9.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Audi TT | 2003 Xedos 9 | |
| Make | Audi | Xedos |
| Model | TT | 9 |
| Year Released | 2000 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1781 cc | 2495 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 217 HP | 161 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5700 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 286 Nm | 212 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2200 RPM | 4900 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1475 kg | 1585 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 4880 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1780 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1400 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2760 mm |
