2000 Audi TT vs. 2004 Ford E-350
To start off, 2004 Ford E-350 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Audi TT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Audi TT would be higher. At 5,408 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Ford E-350 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford E-350 (255 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 85 more horse power than 2000 Audi TT. (170 HP @ 5700 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford E-350 should accelerate faster than 2000 Audi TT. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford E-350 weights approximately 1142 kg more than 2000 Audi TT. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford E-350 (475 Nm) has 240 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Audi TT. (235 Nm). This means 2004 Ford E-350 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Audi TT.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Audi TT | 2004 Ford E-350 | |
Make | Audi | Ford |
Model | TT | E-350 |
Year Released | 2000 | 2004 |
Body Type | Coupe | Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1781 cc | 5408 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 170 HP | 255 HP |
Engine RPM | 5700 RPM | 6250 RPM |
Torque | 235 Nm | 475 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 9.0:1 |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1280 kg | 2422 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 5390 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 2020 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 2120 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 3510 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 132 L |