2000 Audi TT vs. 2004 GMC Sierra
To start off, 2004 GMC Sierra is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Audi TT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Audi TT would be higher. At 5,964 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 GMC Sierra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 GMC Sierra (300 HP) has 120 more horse power than 2000 Audi TT. (180 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2004 GMC Sierra should accelerate faster than 2000 Audi TT.
Because 2000 Audi TT is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2004 GMC Sierra. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Audi TT will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 GMC Sierra (488 Nm) has 243 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Audi TT. (245 Nm). This means 2004 GMC Sierra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Audi TT.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Audi TT | 2004 GMC Sierra | |
Make | Audi | GMC |
Model | TT | Sierra |
Year Released | 2000 | 2004 |
Body Type | Coupe | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1781 cc | 5964 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 180 HP | 300 HP |
Torque | 245 Nm | 488 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 81 mm | 102 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 86.4 mm | 92 mm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 3 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 5650 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 2030 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1940 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 3380 mm |