2000 Audi TT vs. 2004 Mercury Sable
To start off, 2004 Mercury Sable is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Audi TT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Audi TT would be higher. At 2,983 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Mercury Sable is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Audi TT (170 HP) has 15 more horse power than 2004 Mercury Sable. (155 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Audi TT should accelerate faster than 2004 Mercury Sable. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mercury Sable weights approximately 233 kg more than 2000 Audi TT.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Mercury Sable (251 Nm) has 16 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Audi TT. (235 Nm). This means 2004 Mercury Sable will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Audi TT.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Audi TT | 2004 Mercury Sable | |
Make | Audi | Mercury |
Model | TT | Sable |
Year Released | 2000 | 2004 |
Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1781 cc | 2983 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 170 HP | 155 HP |
Torque | 235 Nm | 251 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 81 mm | 89 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 86.4 mm | 79 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 9.7:1 |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 6 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1280 kg | 1513 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 5080 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1860 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2760 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 68 L |