2000 Audi TT vs. 2004 Rover 75
To start off, 2004 Rover 75 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Audi TT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Audi TT would be higher. At 1,951 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Rover 75 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Audi TT (180 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 51 more horse power than 2004 Rover 75. (129 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Audi TT should accelerate faster than 2004 Rover 75.
Because 2000 Audi TT is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2004 Rover 75. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Audi TT will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Audi TT (245 Nm) has 5 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Rover 75. (240 Nm). This means 2000 Audi TT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Rover 75.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Audi TT | 2004 Rover 75 | |
Make | Audi | Rover |
Model | TT | 75 |
Year Released | 2000 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1781 cc | 1951 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 180 HP | 129 HP |
Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 245 Nm | 240 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 81 mm | 84 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 86.4 mm | 88 mm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 4800 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2750 mm |