2000 Audi TT vs. 2005 MCC Crossblade
To start off, 2005 MCC Crossblade is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Audi TT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Audi TT would be higher. At 1,781 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Audi TT is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Audi TT (180 HP) has 110 more horse power than 2005 MCC Crossblade. (70 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Audi TT should accelerate faster than 2005 MCC Crossblade. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Audi TT weights approximately 566 kg more than 2005 MCC Crossblade. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2000 Audi TT is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2005 MCC Crossblade. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Audi TT will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Audi TT (226 Nm) has 124 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 MCC Crossblade. (102 Nm). This means 2000 Audi TT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 MCC Crossblade.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Audi TT | 2005 MCC Crossblade | |
| Make | Audi | MCC |
| Model | TT | Crossblade |
| Year Released | 2000 | 2005 |
| Engine Size | 1781 cc | 599 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 180 HP | 70 HP |
| Torque | 226 Nm | 102 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1310 kg | 744 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 2630 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1630 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1520 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 1810 mm |
