2000 Audi TT vs. 2006 Fiat Croma
To start off, 2006 Fiat Croma is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Audi TT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Audi TT would be higher. At 2,197 cc, 2006 Fiat Croma is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Audi TT (170 HP) has 25 more horse power than 2006 Fiat Croma. (145 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Audi TT should accelerate faster than 2006 Fiat Croma. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Fiat Croma weights approximately 95 kg more than 2000 Audi TT.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Audi TT (235 Nm) has 32 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Fiat Croma. (203 Nm). This means 2000 Audi TT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Fiat Croma.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Audi TT | 2006 Fiat Croma | |
Make | Audi | Fiat |
Model | TT | Croma |
Year Released | 2000 | 2006 |
Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1781 cc | 2197 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 170 HP | 145 HP |
Torque | 235 Nm | 203 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 81 mm | 86 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 86.4 mm | 94.6 mm |
Top Speed | 209 km/hour | 210 km/hour |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1280 kg | 1375 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 4000 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1700 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2830 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 62 L |