2000 Audi TT vs. 2006 Lincoln Navigator
To start off, 2006 Lincoln Navigator is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Audi TT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Audi TT would be higher. At 5,408 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Lincoln Navigator is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Lincoln Navigator (300 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 120 more horse power than 2000 Audi TT. (180 HP @ 6300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Lincoln Navigator should accelerate faster than 2000 Audi TT.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Lincoln Navigator (496 Nm) has 251 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Audi TT. (245 Nm). This means 2006 Lincoln Navigator will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Audi TT.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Audi TT | 2006 Lincoln Navigator | |
Make | Audi | Lincoln |
Model | TT | Navigator |
Year Released | 2000 | 2006 |
Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1781 cc | 5408 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 3 valves |
Horse Power | 180 HP | 300 HP |
Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 245 Nm | 496 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 81 mm | 90 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 86.4 mm | 106 mm |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 5280 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 2040 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1980 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 3020 mm |