2000 Audi TT vs. 2006 Mazda MPV
To start off, 2006 Mazda MPV is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Audi TT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Audi TT would be higher. At 2,966 cc, 2006 Mazda MPV is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mazda MPV (200 HP) has 30 more horse power than 2000 Audi TT. (170 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mazda MPV should accelerate faster than 2000 Audi TT. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Audi TT weights approximately 470 kg more than 2006 Mazda MPV.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Mazda MPV (271 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 36 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Audi TT. (235 Nm @ 1950 RPM). This means 2006 Mazda MPV will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Audi TT.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Audi TT | 2006 Mazda MPV | |
Make | Audi | Mazda |
Model | TT | MPV |
Year Released | 2000 | 2006 |
Body Type | Coupe | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1781 cc | 2966 cc |
Horse Power | 170 HP | 200 HP |
Torque | 235 Nm | 271 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1950 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1280 kg | 810 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 4810 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1750 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2850 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 75 L |