2000 Audi TT vs. 2008 Isuzu KB
To start off, 2008 Isuzu KB is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Audi TT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Audi TT would be higher. At 2,197 cc, 2008 Isuzu KB is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Isuzu KB weights approximately 180 kg more than 2000 Audi TT.
Because 2008 Isuzu KB is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2008 Isuzu KB. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Audi TT, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Audi TT (235 Nm @ 1950 RPM) has 45 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Isuzu KB. (190 Nm @ 3800 RPM). This means 2000 Audi TT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Isuzu KB.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Audi TT | 2008 Isuzu KB | |
Make | Audi | Isuzu |
Model | TT | KB |
Year Released | 2000 | 2008 |
Body Type | Coupe | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1781 cc | 2197 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 170 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 235 Nm | 190 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1950 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 81 mm | 86 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 86.4 mm | 94.6 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 9.2:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 3 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1280 kg | 1460 kg |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1810 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 3030 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 75 L |