2000 Audi TT vs. 2008 Renault Clio
To start off, 2008 Renault Clio is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Audi TT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Audi TT would be higher. At 1,781 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Audi TT is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Audi TT weights approximately 240 kg more than 2008 Renault Clio.
Because 2000 Audi TT is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2008 Renault Clio. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Audi TT will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Audi TT (226 Nm) has 78 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Renault Clio. (148 Nm). This means 2000 Audi TT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Audi TT | 2008 Renault Clio | |
| Make | Audi | Renault |
| Model | TT | Clio |
| Year Released | 2000 | 2008 |
| Body Type | Convertible | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1781 cc | 1598 cc |
| Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 180 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 226 Nm | 148 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 81 mm | 79.6 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 86.4 mm | 80.5 mm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1310 kg | 1070 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 3990 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1730 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1500 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2480 mm |
