2000 Audi TT vs. 2009 Mitsubishi Colt
To start off, 2009 Mitsubishi Colt is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Audi TT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Audi TT would be higher. At 1,781 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Audi TT is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Audi TT (180 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 110 more horse power than 2009 Mitsubishi Colt. (70 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Audi TT should accelerate faster than 2009 Mitsubishi Colt.
Because 2000 Audi TT is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 Mitsubishi Colt. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Audi TT will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Audi TT (245 Nm) has 120 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Mitsubishi Colt. (125 Nm). This means 2000 Audi TT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Mitsubishi Colt.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Audi TT | 2009 Mitsubishi Colt | |
Make | Audi | Mitsubishi |
Model | TT | Colt |
Year Released | 2000 | 2009 |
Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1781 cc | 1332 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 180 HP | 70 HP |
Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 245 Nm | 125 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 81 mm | 75 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 86.4 mm | 75.4 mm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 3640 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1695 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1550 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2500 mm |