2000 Audi TT vs. 2010 Nissan GT-R
To start off, 2010 Nissan GT-R is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Audi TT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Audi TT would be higher. At 3,800 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Nissan GT-R is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Nissan GT-R (485 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 305 more horse power than 2000 Audi TT. (180 HP @ 6300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Nissan GT-R should accelerate faster than 2000 Audi TT.
With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Nissan GT-R (588 Nm) has 343 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Audi TT. (245 Nm). This means 2010 Nissan GT-R will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Audi TT.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Audi TT | 2010 Nissan GT-R | |
| Make | Audi | Nissan |
| Model | TT | GT-R |
| Year Released | 2000 | 2010 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1781 cc | 3800 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 180 HP | 485 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 6400 RPM |
| Torque | 245 Nm | 588 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | AWD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 4651 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1902 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1372 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2779 mm |
