2000 Audi TT vs. 2011 Ford C-Max
To start off, 2011 Ford C-Max is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Audi TT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Audi TT would be higher. At 1,781 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Audi TT is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Audi TT (180 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 30 more horse power than 2011 Ford C-Max. (150 HP @ 5700 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Audi TT should accelerate faster than 2011 Ford C-Max.
Because 2000 Audi TT is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2011 Ford C-Max. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Audi TT will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Ford C-Max (270 Nm) has 25 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Audi TT. (245 Nm). This means 2011 Ford C-Max will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Audi TT.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Audi TT | 2011 Ford C-Max | |
| Make | Audi | Ford |
| Model | TT | C-Max |
| Year Released | 2000 | 2011 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Minivan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1781 cc | 1596 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 180 HP | 150 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 5700 RPM |
| Torque | 245 Nm | 270 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 7 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 4520 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1828 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1684 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2788 mm |
