2000 Audi TT vs. 2011 Nissan Rogue
To start off, 2011 Nissan Rogue is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Audi TT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Audi TT would be higher. At 2,500 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Nissan Rogue is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Audi TT (180 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 10 more horse power than 2011 Nissan Rogue. (170 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Audi TT should accelerate faster than 2011 Nissan Rogue.
Because 2000 Audi TT is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2011 Nissan Rogue. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Audi TT will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Nissan Rogue (237 Nm) has 11 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Audi TT. (226 Nm). This means 2011 Nissan Rogue will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Audi TT.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Audi TT | 2011 Nissan Rogue | |
| Make | Audi | Nissan |
| Model | TT | Rogue |
| Year Released | 2000 | 2011 |
| Body Type | Convertible | Crossover |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1781 cc | 2500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 180 HP | 170 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 226 Nm | 237 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | CVT |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 4681 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1801 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1659 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2690 mm |
