2000 Audi TT vs. 2012 Chevrolet Captiva
To start off, 2012 Chevrolet Captiva is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Audi TT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Audi TT would be higher. At 2,384 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Chevrolet Captiva is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Audi TT (170 HP) has 5 more horse power than 2012 Chevrolet Captiva. (165 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Audi TT should accelerate faster than 2012 Chevrolet Captiva.
Because 2012 Chevrolet Captiva is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Audi TT. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Chevrolet Captiva will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Audi TT (235 Nm) has 5 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Chevrolet Captiva. (230 Nm). This means 2000 Audi TT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Chevrolet Captiva.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Audi TT | 2012 Chevrolet Captiva | |
Make | Audi | Chevrolet |
Model | TT | Captiva |
Year Released | 2000 | 2012 |
Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1781 cc | 2384 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 170 HP | 165 HP |
Torque | 235 Nm | 230 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 4673 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1849 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1756 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2707 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 65 L |