2000 Audi TT vs. 2012 Daewoo Matiz
To start off, 2012 Daewoo Matiz is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Audi TT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Audi TT would be higher. At 1,781 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Audi TT is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Audi TT (180 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 117 more horse power than 2012 Daewoo Matiz. (63 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Audi TT should accelerate faster than 2012 Daewoo Matiz.
Because 2000 Audi TT is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2012 Daewoo Matiz. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Audi TT will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Audi TT (245 Nm) has 158 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Daewoo Matiz. (87 Nm). This means 2000 Audi TT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Daewoo Matiz.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Audi TT | 2012 Daewoo Matiz | |
| Make | Audi | Daewoo |
| Model | TT | Matiz |
| Year Released | 2000 | 2012 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1781 cc | 995 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 180 HP | 63 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 5400 RPM |
| Torque | 245 Nm | 87 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 81 mm | 68.5 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 86.4 mm | 67.5 mm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 3500 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1500 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1490 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2350 mm |
