2000 Audi TT vs. 2013 Hyundai Equus
To start off, 2013 Hyundai Equus is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Audi TT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Audi TT would be higher. At 5,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 Hyundai Equus is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Hyundai Equus (423 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 253 more horse power than 2000 Audi TT. (170 HP @ 5700 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Hyundai Equus should accelerate faster than 2000 Audi TT. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Hyundai Equus weights approximately 809 kg more than 2000 Audi TT. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2013 Hyundai Equus is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2013 Hyundai Equus. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Audi TT, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Hyundai Equus (510 Nm @ 5000 RPM) has 275 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Audi TT. (235 Nm @ 1950 RPM). This means 2013 Hyundai Equus will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Audi TT. 2013 Hyundai Equus has automatic transmission and 2000 Audi TT has manual transmission. 2000 Audi TT will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2013 Hyundai Equus will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Audi TT | 2013 Hyundai Equus | |
| Make | Audi | Hyundai |
| Model | TT | Equus |
| Year Released | 2000 | 2013 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1781 cc | 5000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 170 HP | 423 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5700 RPM | 6400 RPM |
| Torque | 235 Nm | 510 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 1950 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 81 mm | 96 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 86.4 mm | 87 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 11.5:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 8-speed automatic |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1280 kg | 2089 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 5158 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1889 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1490 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 3045 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 77 L |
