2000 Audi TT vs. 2013 Mazda 3

To start off, 2013 Mazda 3 is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Audi TT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Audi TT would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2013 Mazda 3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Audi TT (170 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 17 more horse power than 2013 Mazda 3. (153 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Audi TT should accelerate faster than 2013 Mazda 3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Mazda 3 weights approximately 98 kg more than 2000 Audi TT.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Audi TT (235 Nm @ 1950 RPM) has 35 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Mazda 3. (200 Nm @ 4100 RPM). This means 2000 Audi TT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Mazda 3.

Compare all specifications:

2000 Audi TT 2013 Mazda 3
Make Audi Mazda
Model TT 3
Year Released 2000 2013
Body Type Coupe Sedan
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1781 cc 1998 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 5 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 170 HP 153 HP
Engine RPM 5700 RPM 6000 RPM
Torque 235 Nm 200 Nm
Torque RPM 1950 RPM 4100 RPM
Engine Bore Size 81 mm 84 mm
Engine Stroke Size 86.4 mm 91 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 10.0:1 12.0:1
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Front Front
Transmission Type Manual 6-speed manual
Number of Seats 4 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Weight 1280 kg 1378 kg
Vehicle Length 4050 mm 4595 mm
Vehicle Width 1770 mm 1755 mm
Vehicle Height 1350 mm 1470 mm
Wheelbase Size 2430 mm 2640 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 55 L 55 L