2000 Audi TT vs. 2013 Mercedes-Benz SLK
To start off, 2013 Mercedes-Benz SLK is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Audi TT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Audi TT would be higher. At 5,500 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 Mercedes-Benz SLK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Mercedes-Benz SLK (409 HP @ 6800 RPM) has 229 more horse power than 2000 Audi TT. (180 HP @ 6300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Mercedes-Benz SLK should accelerate faster than 2000 Audi TT.
Because 2000 Audi TT is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2013 Mercedes-Benz SLK. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Audi TT will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Mercedes-Benz SLK (540 Nm) has 295 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Audi TT. (245 Nm). This means 2013 Mercedes-Benz SLK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Audi TT.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Audi TT | 2013 Mercedes-Benz SLK | |
Make | Audi | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | TT | SLK |
Year Released | 2000 | 2013 |
Body Type | Coupe | Roadster |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 1781 cc | 5500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 8 valves |
Horse Power | 180 HP | 409 HP |
Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 6800 RPM |
Torque | 245 Nm | 540 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 81 mm | 98 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 86.4 mm | 90 mm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | 4-speed manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 4146 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 2006 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1300 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2430 mm |