2000 Bentley Arnage vs. 1965 DAF Daffodil
To start off, 2000 Bentley Arnage is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 DAF Daffodil. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 DAF Daffodil would be higher. At 4,398 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Bentley Arnage is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Bentley Arnage (350 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 324 more horse power than 1965 DAF Daffodil. (26 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Bentley Arnage should accelerate faster than 1965 DAF Daffodil. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Bentley Arnage weights approximately 1662 kg more than 1965 DAF Daffodil. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Bentley Arnage | 1965 DAF Daffodil | |
Make | Bentley | DAF |
Model | Arnage | Daffodil |
Year Released | 2000 | 1965 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4398 cc | 746 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 350 HP | 26 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2322 kg | 660 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5650 mm | 3620 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2130 mm | 1450 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3070 mm | 2060 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 94 L | 33 L |