2000 Bentley Arnage vs. 2004 Lotec C 1000
To start off, 2004 Lotec C 1000 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Bentley Arnage. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Bentley Arnage would be higher. At 5,500 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Lotec C 1000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Lotec C 1000 (844 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 494 more horse power than 2000 Bentley Arnage. (350 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Lotec C 1000 should accelerate faster than 2000 Bentley Arnage. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Bentley Arnage weights approximately 1242 kg more than 2004 Lotec C 1000.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Lotec C 1000 (990 Nm @ 3900 RPM) has 420 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Bentley Arnage. (570 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2004 Lotec C 1000 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Bentley Arnage.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Bentley Arnage | 2004 Lotec C 1000 | |
Make | Bentley | Lotec |
Model | Arnage | C 1000 |
Year Released | 2000 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 4398 cc | 5500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 350 HP | 844 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 570 Nm | 990 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 3900 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 2322 kg | 1080 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5650 mm | 4300 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2130 mm | 2010 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1150 mm |