2000 Bizzarrini BZ-2001 vs. 1952 Jaguar XK
To start off, 2000 Bizzarrini BZ-2001 is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Jaguar XK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Jaguar XK would be higher. At 6,900 cc (12 cylinders), 2000 Bizzarrini BZ-2001 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Bizzarrini BZ-2001 (500 HP) has 342 more horse power than 1952 Jaguar XK. (158 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Bizzarrini BZ-2001 should accelerate faster than 1952 Jaguar XK. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Jaguar XK weights approximately 95 kg more than 2000 Bizzarrini BZ-2001.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Bizzarrini BZ-2001 | 1952 Jaguar XK | |
| Make | Bizzarrini | Jaguar |
| Model | BZ-2001 | XK |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1952 |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 6900 cc | 3441 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 500 HP | 158 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1200 kg | 1295 kg |
| Vehicle Width | 2160 mm | 1570 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2600 mm |
