2000 Bizzarrini BZ-2001 vs. 2004 Chevrolet Tracker
To start off, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Bizzarrini BZ-2001. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Bizzarrini BZ-2001 would be higher. At 6,900 cc (12 cylinders), 2000 Bizzarrini BZ-2001 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Bizzarrini BZ-2001 (500 HP) has 335 more horse power than 2004 Chevrolet Tracker. (165 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Bizzarrini BZ-2001 should accelerate faster than 2004 Chevrolet Tracker. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Chevrolet Tracker weights approximately 173 kg more than 2000 Bizzarrini BZ-2001.
Because 2004 Chevrolet Tracker is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Bizzarrini BZ-2001. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Bizzarrini BZ-2001 | 2004 Chevrolet Tracker | |
| Make | Bizzarrini | Chevrolet |
| Model | BZ-2001 | Tracker |
| Year Released | 2000 | 2004 |
| Body Type | Roadster | SUV |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 6900 cc | 2491 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 500 HP | 165 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1200 kg | 1373 kg |
| Vehicle Width | 2160 mm | 1720 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2660 mm |
