2000 Bizzarrini BZ-2001 vs. 2013 Dodge CHARGER
To start off, 2013 Dodge CHARGER is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Bizzarrini BZ-2001. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Bizzarrini BZ-2001 would be higher. At 6,900 cc (12 cylinders), 2000 Bizzarrini BZ-2001 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Bizzarrini BZ-2001 (500 HP) has 212 more horse power than 2013 Dodge CHARGER. (288 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Bizzarrini BZ-2001 should accelerate faster than 2013 Dodge CHARGER. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Dodge CHARGER weights approximately 683 kg more than 2000 Bizzarrini BZ-2001.
Because 2013 Dodge CHARGER is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Bizzarrini BZ-2001. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Dodge CHARGER will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Bizzarrini BZ-2001 | 2013 Dodge CHARGER | |
| Make | Bizzarrini | Dodge |
| Model | BZ-2001 | CHARGER |
| Year Released | 2000 | 2013 |
| Body Type | Roadster | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 6900 cc | 3600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 500 HP | 288 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Flex Fuel |
| Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1200 kg | 1883 kg |
| Vehicle Width | 2160 mm | 1905 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 3052 mm |
