2000 BMW 316 vs. 1950 Holden FX
To start off, 2000 BMW 316 is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Holden FX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Holden FX would be higher. At 2,165 cc (6 cylinders), 1950 Holden FX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 BMW 316 (105 HP) has 54 more horse power than 1950 Holden FX. (51 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2000 BMW 316 should accelerate faster than 1950 Holden FX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 BMW 316 weights approximately 340 kg more than 1950 Holden FX. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 BMW 316 (150 Nm @ 3900 RPM) has 14 more torque (in Nm) than 1950 Holden FX. (136 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2000 BMW 316 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1950 Holden FX.
Compare all specifications:
2000 BMW 316 | 1950 Holden FX | |
Make | BMW | Holden |
Model | 316 | FX |
Year Released | 2000 | 1950 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1596 cc | 2165 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 105 HP | 51 HP |
Torque | 150 Nm | 136 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3900 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1310 kg | 970 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 4380 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1580 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2620 mm |