2000 BMW 316 vs. 1954 Singer Hunter
To start off, 2000 BMW 316 is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Singer Hunter. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Singer Hunter would be higher. At 1,796 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 BMW 316 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 BMW 316 (113 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 66 more horse power than 1954 Singer Hunter. (47 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 BMW 316 should accelerate faster than 1954 Singer Hunter. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 BMW 316 weights approximately 258 kg more than 1954 Singer Hunter. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2000 BMW 316 has automatic transmission and 1954 Singer Hunter has manual transmission. 1954 Singer Hunter will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 BMW 316 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2000 BMW 316 | 1954 Singer Hunter | |
Make | BMW | Singer |
Model | 316 | Hunter |
Year Released | 2000 | 1954 |
Engine Size | 1796 cc | 1497 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 113 HP | 47 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1398 kg | 1140 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1610 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1630 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2180 mm |