2000 BMW 316 vs. 1954 Talbot T 26
To start off, 2000 BMW 316 is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Talbot T 26. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Talbot T 26 would be higher. At 4,482 cc (6 cylinders), 1954 Talbot T 26 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1954 Talbot T 26 (198 HP @ 4300 RPM) has 85 more horse power than 2000 BMW 316. (113 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1954 Talbot T 26 should accelerate faster than 2000 BMW 316. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1954 Talbot T 26 weights approximately 212 kg more than 2000 BMW 316. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2000 BMW 316 has automatic transmission and 1954 Talbot T 26 has manual transmission. 1954 Talbot T 26 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 BMW 316 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2000 BMW 316 | 1954 Talbot T 26 | |
Make | BMW | Talbot |
Model | 316 | T 26 |
Year Released | 2000 | 1954 |
Engine Size | 1796 cc | 4482 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 113 HP | 198 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4300 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1398 kg | 1610 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 4860 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1890 mm |